Transfer of the Distal Anterior Interosseous Nerve for Thumb Motion Reconstruction in Radial Nerve Paralysis.

PURPOSE: With nerve or tendon surgery, the results of thumb reconstruction to treat radial nerve paralysis are suboptimal. The goals of this study were to describe the anatomy of the deep branch of the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) to the thumb extensor muscles (DBPIN), and to report the clinical results of transferring the distal anterior interosseous nerve (DAIN) to the DBPIN. METHODS: The PIN was dissected in 12 fresh upper limbs. Myelinated nerve fibers in the DBPIN and DAIN were counted. Five patients with radial nerve paralysis underwent transfer of the motor branch to the flexor carpi radialis to the PIN and a motor branch of the pronator teres to the extensor carpi radialis brevis. In addition, these patients had selective reconstruction of thumb motion by transferring the DAIN to the DBPIN, through either a combined volar and dorsal approach (n = 2) or a single dorsal approach (n = 3) with division of the interosseous membrane. RESULTS: At the origin of the abductor pollicis longus, the DBPIN divided into a lateral branch that innervated the abductor pollicis longus and extensor pollicis brevis, and a medial branch that innervated the extensor pollicis longus and extensor index proprius. The number of myelinated nerve fibers in the DAIN corresponded to 65% of that of the DBPIN. In each of the 5 patients, full thumb motion at the trapeziometacarpal joint was restored with no, or minimal, extension lag at the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint. CONCLUSIONS: The anatomy of the DBPIN is predictable. Transferring the DAIN to the DBPIN is feasible through a single dorsal approach, allowing full recovery of thumb motion. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.

Distal pronator teres motor branch transfer for wrist extension restoration in radial nerve paralysis.

OBJECTIVE: The authors describe the anatomy of the motor branches of the pronator teres (PT) as it relates to transferring the nerve of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) to restore wrist extension in patients with radial nerve paralysis. They describe their anatomical cadaveric findings and report the results of their nerve transfer technique in several patients followed for at least 24 months postoperatively. METHODS: The authors dissected both upper limbs of 16 fresh cadavers. In 6 patients undergoing nerve surgery on the elbow, they dissected the branches of the median nerve and confirmed their identity by electrical stimulation. Of these 6 patients, 5 had had a radial nerve injury lasting 7-12 months, underwent transfer of the distal PT motor branch to the ECRB, and were followed for at least 24 months. RESULTS: The PT was innervated by two branches: a proximal branch, arising at a distance between 0 and 40 mm distal to the medial epicondyle, responsible for PT superficial head innervation, and a distal motor branch, emerging from the anterior side of the median nerve at a distance between 25 and 60 mm distal to the medial epicondyle. The distal motor branch of the PT traveled approximately 30 mm along the anterior side of the median nerve; just before the median nerve passed between the PT heads, it bifurcated to innervate the deep head and distal part of the superficial head of the PT. In 30% of the cadaver limbs, the proximal and distal PT branches converged into a single trunk distal to the medial epicondyle, while they converged into a single branch proximal to it in 70% of the limbs. The proximal and distal motor branches of the PT and the nerve to the ECRB had an average of 646, 599, and 457 myelinated fibers, respectively.All patients recovered full range of wrist flexion-extension, grade M4 strength on the British Medical Research Council scale. Grasp strength recovery achieved almost 50% of the strength of the contralateral side. All patients could maintain their wrist in extension while performing grasp measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The distal PT motor branch is suitable for reinnervation of the ECRB in radial nerve paralysis, for as long as 7-12 months postinjury.

Transferring the Motor Branch of the Opponens Pollicis to the Terminal Division of the Deep Branch of the Ulnar Nerve for Pinch Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: With ulnar nerve injuries, paralysis of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and the adductor pollicis (ADP) muscles weakens pinch. The likelihood that these muscles will be reinnervated following ulnar nerve repair around the elbow is very low. To overcome this obstacle, we propose a more distal repair: transferring the opponens pollicis motor branch (OPB) to the terminal division of the deep branch of the ulnar nerve (TDDBUN). METHODS: We dissected 10 embalmed hands to study the anatomy of the thenar branches of the median nerve and TDDBUN. We also operated on 3 patients with recent ulnar nerve injuries around the elbow, suturing the ulnar nerve and transferring the OPB to the TDDBUN. Before and after surgery, we measured grasp, key pinch, and pinch-to-zoom strength using dynamometers. Pinch-to-zoom gesture consists of moving the index finger and thumb pulp toward each other for zooming out of an image on screen. Patients were followed for at least 15 months. RESULTS: The thenar branch of the median nerve innervated the abductor pollicis brevis and opponens pollicis in all specimens, but only half the superficial head of the flexor pollicis brevis. The TDDBUN gave off a single motor branch to the transverse head of the ADP, 1 or 2 branches to the oblique head, and a final branch to the FDI. The ratio of myelinated fibers between the OPB and the TDDBUN was 3:5. Relative to the normal side, pinch-to-zoom strength was mostly affected by the ulnar nerve lesion, with strength decreased by 80% to 90%. After surgery, we observed reinnervation of the FDI and an 80% to 90% improvement in pinch-to-zoom strength. CONCLUSIONS: Transferring the OPB to the TDDBUN provided reinnervation of the FDI and ADP, thereby contributing to pinch strength improvement. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.

Sensory deficits after a radial nerve injury.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to objectively test sensibility on the dorsal side of the hand in patients with radial nerve injury, to document deficits and to detect if surgery for sensory reconstruction is needed. METHODS: Nineteen patients of mean age 31 ± 10 years were examined at a mean of 26.4 ± 27.8 months post radial nerve injury. Sensory mechanical thresholds on the dorsal surface of the hand were evaluated using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. Sensation was considered significantly impaired when there was no perception of a 2.0 gr. Semmes-Weinstein filament. Nociception was evaluated using Adson forceps. RESULTS: Five patients had normal 2.0 monofilament perception. Two of these five also had normal perception of the lighter 0.05 monofilament. In nine patients, zones of impaired sensibility were restricted to the first web space. In combined radial and musculocutaneous nerve lesions, the zone of impaired sensibility extended to the dorsum of the third metacarpus and occasionally to the dorsal aspect of the thumb. This zone averaged being five times the size as in isolated radial nerve injuries. On average, the zone of decreased 0.05 monofilament perception was six times the size detected for the 2.0 monofilament. No patient had complete anesthesia over the dorsum of the hand. No patient complained about pain or numbness. Only one patient among four with a combined radial and musculocutaneous nerve injury required sensory reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Minimal sensory abnormalities should be expected after a radial nerve injury. Patients likely neither warrant nor request sensory reconstruction.

Transfer of the Motor Branch of the Abductor Digiti Quinti for Thenar Muscle Reinnervation in High Median Nerve Injuries.

PURPOSE: In high median nerve repairs, thenar muscle reinnervation is impossible because of the long distances over which axons must regenerate. To overcome this obstacle, we propose transferring the abductor digiti quinti motor branch (ADQMB) to the thenar branch of the median nerve (TBMN). METHODS: We used 10 embalmed hands for anatomical and histological studies. Thereafter, 5 patients with a high median nerve injury underwent surgical reconstruction within 8 months of their accident and were followed for at least 10 months after surgery (mean, 13.2 months). We transferred the ADQMB to the TBMN. The median nerve was grafted in 4 patients and the motor branch of the extensor carpi radialis brevis was transferred to the anterior interosseous nerve in 3. Patients had pre- and postoperative evaluations of thumb range of motion and strength. RESULTS: In cadaveric hands, the ADQMB was the first branch of the ulnar nerve to arise near the pisiform bone. The TBMN arose from the anterior surface of the median nerve, underneath the flexor retinaculum. Retrograde dissection of the TBMN allowed tension-free coaptation with the ADQMB. Both branches contained approximately 650 myelinated fibers. After surgery, all our patients improved thumb pronation, thenar eminence bulk, and abductor pollicis brevis British Medical Research Council score. They recovered approximately 75% of their normal-side grasp and pinch strength. No patient lost little finger abduction. CONCLUSIONS: Transfer of the ADQMB to the TBMN reinnervated the thenar muscles, which improved thumb range of motion and strength. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.

Nerve and Free Gracilis Muscle Transfers for Thumb and Finger Extension Reconstruction in Long-standing Tetraplegia.

PURPOSE: With spinal cord injuries, muscles below the level of the lesion remain innervated despite the absence of volitional control. This persistent innervation protects against denervation atrophy and may allow for nerve transfers to treat long-standing lesions within the spinal cord. We tested the hypothesis that in chronic spinal cord lesions, muscles remained viable for reinnervation. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, we operated on 7 patients with tetraplegia to reconstruct thumb and finger extension after a mean interval of 5 years since injury. During surgery, if electrical stimulation of the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) produced muscle contraction, the nerve to the supinator (NS) was transferred to the PIN. If no contractions were demonstrated, the muscles of the extensor compartment of the forearm were replaced via a free gracilis transfer with innervation supplied by the NS. RESULTS: After an average of 26 months, M3 recovery of thumb and finger extension was observed in the 3 upper limbs from the 2 youngest patients who underwent a nerve transfer. None of the free gracilis-treated patients achieved scores above M2. CONCLUSIONS: In our youngest patients aged 27 and 34 years, who were operated on 6 years after spinal cord injury, transfer of the NS to the PIN partially restored hand span. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.

Results of spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer in 110 patients with complete palsy of the brachial plexus.

OBJECTIVE Transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve is a common procedure, performed to reestablish shoulder motion in patients with total brachial plexus palsy. However, the results of this procedure remain largely unknown. METHODS Over an 11-year period (2002-2012), 257 patients with total brachial plexus palsy were operated upon in the authors' department by a single surgeon and had the spinal accessory nerve transferred to the suprascapular nerve. Among these, 110 had adequate follow-up and were included in this study. Their average age was 26 years (SD 8.4 years), and the mean interval between their injury and surgery was 5.2 months (SD 2.4 months). Prior to 2005, the suprascapular and spinal accessory nerves were dissected through a classic supraclavicular L-shape incision (n = 29). Afterward (n = 81), the spinal accessory and suprascapular nerves were dissected via an oblique incision, extending from the point at which the plexus crossed the clavicle to the anterior border of the trapezius muscle. In 17 of these patients, because of clavicle fractures or dislocation, scapular fractures or retroclavicular scarring, the incision was extended by detaching the trapezius from the clavicle to expose the suprascapular nerve at the suprascapular fossa. In all patients, the brachial plexus was explored and elbow flexion reconstructed by root grafting (n = 95), root grafting and phrenic nerve transfer (n = 6), phrenic nerve transfer (n = 1), or third, fourth, and fifth intercostal nerve transfer. Postoperatively, patients were followed for an average of 40 months (SD 13.7 months). RESULTS Failed recovery, meaning less than 30° abduction, was observed in 10 (9%) of the 110 patients. The failure rate was 25% between 2002 and 2004, but dropped to 5% after the staged/extended approach was introduced. The mean overall range of abduction recovery was 58.5° (SD 26°). Comparing before and after distal suprascapular nerve exploration (2005-2012), the range of abduction recovery was 45° (SD 25.1°) versus 62° (SD 25.3°), respectively (p = 0.002). In patients who recovered at least 30° of abduction, recovery of elbow flexion to at least an M3 level of strength increased the range of abduction by an average of 13° (p = 0.01). Before the extended approach, 2 (7%) of 29 patients recovered active external rotation of 20° and 120°. With the staged/extended approach, 32 (40%) of 81 recovered some degree of active external rotation. In these patients, the average range of motion measured from the thorax was 87° (SD 40.6°). CONCLUSIONS In total palsies of the brachial plexus, using the spinal accessory nerve for transfer to the suprascapular nerve is reliable and provides some recovery of abduction for a large majority of patients. In a few patients, a more extensive approach to access the suprascapular nerve, including, if necessary, dissection in the suprascapular fossa, may enhance outcomes.

Results of nerve grafting in radial nerve injuries occurring proximal to the humerus, including those within the posterior cord.

OBJECTIVE Results of radial nerve grafting are largely unknown for lesions of the radial nerve that occur proximal to the humerus, including those within the posterior cord. METHODS The authors describe 13 patients with proximal radial nerve injuries who were surgically treated and then followed for at least 24 months. The patients' average age was 26 years and the average time between accident and surgery was 6 months. Sural nerve graft length averaged 12 cm. Recovery was scored according to the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) scale, which ranges from M0 to M5 (normal muscle strength). RESULTS After grafting, all 7 patients with an elbow extension palsy recovered elbow extension, scoring M4. Six of the 13 recovered M4 wrist extension, 6 had M3, and 1 had M2. Thumb and finger extension was scored M4 in 3 patients, M3 in 2, M2 in 2, and M0 in 6. CONCLUSIONS The authors consider levels of strength of M4 for elbow and wrist extension and M3 for thumb and finger extension to be good results. Based on these criteria, overall good results were obtained in only 5 of the 13 patients. In proximal radial nerve lesions, the authors now advocate combining nerve grafts with nerve or tendon transfers to reconstruct wrist, thumb, and finger extension.

Results of wrist extension reconstruction in C5-8 brachial plexus palsy by transferring the pronator quadratus motor branch to the extensor carpi radialis brevis muscle.

OBJECT The objective of this study was to report the results of pronator quadratus (PQ) motor branch transfers to the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) motor branch to reconstruct wrist extension in C5-8 root lesions of the brachial plexus. METHODS Twenty-eight patients, averaging 24 years of age, with C5-8 root injuries underwent operations an average of 7 months after their accident. In 19 patients, wrist extension was impossible at baseline, whereas in 9 patients wrist extension was managed by activating thumb and wrist extensors. When these 9 patients grasped an object, their wrist dropped and grasp strength was lost. Wrist extension was reconstructed by transferring the PQ motor to the ECRB motor branch. After surgery, patients were followed for at least 12 months, with final follow-up an average of 22 months after surgery. RESULTS Successful reinnervation of the ECRB was demonstrated in 27 of the 28 patients. In 25 of the patients, wrist extension scored M4, and in 2 it scored M3. CONCLUSIONS In C5-8 root injuries, wrist extension can be predictably reconstructed by transferring the PQ motor branch to reinnervate the ECRB.

Results of nerve grafting in radial nerve injuries occurring proximal to the humerus, including those within the posterior cord.

OBJECT Results of radial nerve grafting are largely unknown for lesions of the radial nerve that occur proximal to the humerus, including those within the posterior cord. METHODS The authors describe 13 patients with proximal radial nerve injuries who were surgically treated and then followed for at least 24 months. The patients' average age was 26 years and the average time between accident and surgery was 6 months. Sural nerve graft length averaged 12 cm. Recovery was scored according to the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) scale, which ranges from M0 to M5 (normal muscle strength). RESULTS After grafting, all 7 patients with an elbow extension palsy recovered elbow extension, scoring M4. Six of the 13 recovered M4 wrist extension, 6 had M3, and 1 had M2. Thumb and finger extension was scored M4 in 3 patients, M3 in 2, M2 in 2, and M0 in 6. CONCLUSIONS The authors consider levels of strength of M4 for elbow and wrist extension and M3 for thumb and finger extension to be good results. Based on these criteria, overall good results were obtained in only 5 of the 13 patients. In proximal radial nerve lesions, the authors now advocate combining nerve grafts with nerve or tendon transfers to reconstruct wrist, thumb, and finger extension.

The median nerve consistently drives flexion of the distal phalanx of the ring and little fingers: Interest in finger flexion reconstruction by nerve transfers.

Surgeons believe that in high ulnar nerve lesion distal interphalangeal joint (DIP) flexion of the ring and little finger is abolished. In this article, we present the results of a study on innervation of the flexor digitorum profundus of the ring and little fingers in five patients with high ulnar nerve injury and in 19 patients with a brachial plexus, posterior cord, or radial nerve injury. Patients with ulnar nerve lesion were assessed clinically and during surgery for ulnar nerve repair we confirmed complete lesion of the ulnar nerve in all cases. In the remaining 19 patients, during surgery, either the median nerve (MN) or the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) was stimulated electrically and DIP flexion of the ring and little fingers evaluated. All patients with high ulnar nerve lesions had active DIP flexion of the ring and little fingers. Strength scored M4 in the ring and M3-M4 in the little finger. Electrical stimulation of either the MN or AIN produced DIP flexion of the ring and little fingers. Contrary to common knowledge, we identified preserved flexion of the distal phalanx of the ring and little fingers in high ulnar nerve lesions. On the basis of these observations, nerve transfers to the AIN may provide flexion of all fingers.

Nerve transfers for elbow and finger extension reconstruction in midcervical spinal cord injuries.

OBJECT: The objective of this study was to report the results of elbow, thumb, and finger extension reconstruction via nerve transfer in midcervical spinal cord injuries. METHODS: Thirteen upper limbs from 7 patients with tetraplegia, with an average age of 26 years, were operated on an average of 7 months after a spinal cord injury. The posterior division of the axillary nerve was used to reinnervate the triceps long and upper medial head motor branches in 9 upper limbs. Both the posterior division and the branch to the middle deltoid were used in 2 upper limbs, and the anterior division of the axillary nerve in the final 2 limbs. For thumb and finger extension reconstruction, the nerve to the supinator was transferred to the posterior interosseous nerve. RESULTS: In 22 of the 27 recipient nerves, a peripheral type of palsy with muscle denervation was identified. At an average of 19 months follow-up, elbow strength scored M4 in 11 upper limbs and M3 in 2, according to the British Medical Research Council scale. Thumb extension scored M4 in 8 upper limbs and scored M3 in 4. Finger extension scored M4 in 12 hands. No donor-site deficits were reported or observed. CONCLUSIONS: Nerve transfers are effective at restoring elbow, thumb, and finger extension in patients with a midcervical spinal cord injury, which occurs in the majority of patients with a peripheral type of palsy with muscle denervation in their upper limbs. Efforts should be made to perform operations in these patients within 12 months of injury.

The C5 root dermatome enlarges and modulates hand pain in total brachial plexus palsy.

Hand pain is a major complaint in 80% of the patients with complete brachial plexus palsy; and, in 80% of these patients, the C5 root is ruptured and the C6-T1 roots avulsed from the spinal cord. It has been suggested that pain in brachial plexus injuries may not arise from avulsed roots, but rather from ruptured roots. Traditionally the C5 root dermatome does not extend to the hand. We have hypothesized that in total lesions of the brachial plexus the C5 root dermatome expands, reaching the hand. In 20 patients with confirmed C5 root rupture and C6-T1 root avulsion, we investigated the distribution of C5 root paresthesia six to eight weeks after grafting. After cervical percussion in search of Tinel's sign, maps related to reported paresthesia were drawn on the affected limb. We observed that paresthesia following C5 root percussion reached the hands and fingers, dermatomes linked to the C6 and C8 roots. Immediately after percussion, for a few seconds, 14 patients who complained of pain during examination reported the augmentation of numbness and pain resolution. After brachial plexus injury, the C5 root dermatome expands and modulates hand pain.

Nerve transfer from triceps medial head and anconeus to deltoid for axillary nerve palsy.

PURPOSE: To report our results with reconstruction of the axillary nerve by transferring the branch to the triceps lower medial head and anconeus to the anterior division of the axillary nerve. METHODS: This study included 9 patients with isolated injury of the axillary nerve. Their average age ± SD was 35 ± 9 years, and the mean interval ± SD between injury and surgery was 6.6 ± 2.6 months. Through a posterior arm approach, the radial nerve branch to the lower triceps medial head and anconeus was transferred to the anterior division of the axillary nerve. We observed patients for a mean of 34 ± 7 months. At final evaluation, we measured range of shoulder motion, shoulder abduction and elbow extension strength, and abduction endurance. Patients were assessed via the deltoid extension lag test and abduction-in-internal-rotation test. RESULTS: All patients recovered deltoid function and maintained full active elbow extension. Seven of 9 patients recovered from lagging abduction in internal rotation. Abduction strength improved from approximately 40% that of the normal side at 90° of abduction preoperatively to 60% of normal strength postoperatively. There was improved endurance in abduction from approximately 25% to 65% that of the normal side, which was sufficient to eliminate all reports of shoulder pain or fatigability. CONCLUSIONS: Transfer of the radial nerve branch for the lower triceps medial head and anconeus to the anterior division of the axillary nerve proved to be an effective method of deltoid reinnervation. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Single-stage surgery combining nerve and tendon transfers for bilateral upper limb reconstruction in a tetraplegic patient: case report.

A 39-year-old tetraplegic patient had paralysis of elbow, thumb, and finger extension and thumb and finger flexion. We transferred axillary nerve branches to the triceps long and upper medial head motor branches, supinator motor branches to the posterior interosseous nerve, and brachioradialis tendon to the flexor pollicis longus and flexor superficialis of the index finger. Surgery was performed bilaterally 18 months after spinal cord injury. At 12 months after surgery, we performed bilateral distal radioulnar arthrodesis percutaneously. By 22 months postoperatively, we observed triceps strength scoring M3 bilaterally and full metacarpophalangeal joint extension scoring M4 bilaterally. The thumb span was 53 and 66 mm from the proximal index phalanx on the right and left sides, respectively. Pinch strength measured 1.5 kg on the left side and 2.0 kg on the right. Before surgery, the patient was incapable of grasping; after surgery, a useful grasp had been restored bilaterally.

The anabolic steroid nandrolone enhances motor and sensory functional recovery in rat median nerve repair with long interpositional nerve grafts.

BACKGROUND: Recovery from peripheral nerve repair is frequently incomplete. Hence drugs that enhance nerve regeneration are needed clinically. OBJECTIVES: To study the effects of nandrolone decanoate in a model of deficient reinnervation in the rat. METHODS: In 40 rats, a 40-mm segment of the left median nerve was removed and interposed between the stumps of a sectioned right median nerve. Starting 7 days after nerve grafting and continuing over a 6-month period, we administered nandrolone at a dose of 5 mg/kg/wk to half the rats (n = 20). All rats were assessed behaviorally for grasp function and nociceptive recovery for up to 6 months. At final assessment, reinnervated muscles were tested electrophysiologically and weighed. Results were compared between rats that had received versus not received nandrolone and versus 20 nongrafted controls. RESULTS: Rats in the nandrolone group recovered finger flexion faster. At 90 days postsurgery, they had recovered 42% of normal grasp strength versus just 11% in rats grafted but not treated with nandrolone. At 180 days, the average values for grasp strength recovery in the nandrolone and no-nandrolone groups were 40% and 33% of normal values for controls, respectively. At 180 days, finger flexor muscle twitch strength was 16% higher in treated versus nontreated rats. Thresholds for nociception were not detected in either group 90 days after nerve grafting. At 180 days, nociceptive thresholds were significantly lower in the nandrolone group. CONCLUSIONS: Nandrolone decanoate improved functional recovery in a model of deficient reinnervation.

Transfer of a flexor digitorum superficialis motor branch for wrist extension reconstruction in C5-C8 root injuries of the brachial plexus: a case series.

In brachial plexus injuries, though nerve transfers and root grafts have improved the results for shoulder and elbow reconstruction, wrist extension has received little attention. We operated on three young patients with C5-C8 root injuries of the left brachial plexus, each operated upon within 6 months of trauma. For wrist extension reconstruction, we transferred a proximal branch of the flexor digitorum superficialis to the motor branch of the extensor carpi radialis brevis. Twenty-four months after surgery, all patients recovered some degree of active wrist motion, from full flexion to near neutral. Independent control of finger flexion and wrist extension was not observed. In C5-C8 root injuries of the brachial plexus, transfer of a flexor digitorum superficialis motor branch to the extensor carpi radialis brevis produces limited recovery.

Transfer of nerve branch to the brachialis to reconstruct elbow extension in incomplete tetraplegia: case report.

We undertook a brachialis to triceps nerve transfer to restore elbow extension in a 53-year-old man 5 months after he sustained a spine injury that resulted in a central cord syndrome. Within 3 months of surgery, the patient had recovered active elbow extension and had M3 level strength, which increased to M4 and 5 kg of strength by 12 months postoperatively. Despite transferring an antagonist nerve for triceps reinnervation, the patient had no problems controlling active elbow flexion-extension. Harvesting the brachialis nerve caused no permanent decrease in elbow flexion strength.